Core i5-4670T vs Steam Deck OLED APU

Core i5-4670T vs Steam Deck OLED APU Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4670T

4 / 4

4,488

+0.7%

4,457

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4670T vs Steam Deck OLED APU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4670T vs Steam Deck OLED APU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4670T

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Steam Deck OLED APU across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $189 MSRP, while Steam Deck OLED APU mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.

Steam Deck OLED APU

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,457 vs 4,488).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Steam Deck OLED APU better than Core i5-4670T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Steam Deck OLED APU is ahead with a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4670T pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Core i5-4670T also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4670T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Steam Deck OLED APU is still the much better call for a fresh build. Steam Deck OLED APU comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $189 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4670T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Steam Deck OLED APU makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4670T vs Steam Deck OLED APU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670T

The Core i5-4670T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,488 points. Launch price was $220.

Steam Deck OLED APU

The Steam Deck OLED APU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 November 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,457 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4670T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Steam Deck OLED APU's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4670T versus 3.5 GHz on the Steam Deck OLED APU — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Steam Deck OLED APU (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-4670T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Steam Deck OLED APU uses Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670T scores 4,488 against the Steam Deck OLED APU's 4,457 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-4670T. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670T vs 4 MB on the Steam Deck OLED APU.

Feature	Core i5-4670T	Steam Deck OLED APU
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)+50%	4 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	22 nm	6 nm-73%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Van Gogh (Custom) (2023)
PassMark	4,488	4,457