Core i5-4670T vs Xeon E5-2603 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4670T vs Xeon E5-2603 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4670T vs Xeon E5-2603 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4670T

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 85W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,488 vs 4,517).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2603 v4, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $189 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2603 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2603 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads.

Trade-offs

❌88.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4670T better than Xeon E5-2603 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2603 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4670T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2603 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4670T is the better buy right now. Core i5-4670T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $189 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2603 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2603 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013), 150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 6 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4670T vs Xeon E5-2603 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670T

The Core i5-4670T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,488 points. Launch price was $220.

Xeon E5-2603 v4

The Xeon E5-2603 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,517 points. Launch price was $213.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4670T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2603 v4 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon E5-2603 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4670T versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2603 v4 — a 64% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670T (base: 2.3 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i5-4670T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2603 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670T scores 4,488 against the Xeon E5-2603 v4's 4,517 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2603 v4. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670T vs 15 MB on the Xeon E5-2603 v4.

Feature	Core i5-4670T	Xeon E5-2603 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+94%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+35%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	15 MB+150%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1.5 MB+500%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	4,488	4,517

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4670T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2603 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.