Core i5-4670T vs Xeon E5-1603 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4670T vs Xeon E5-1603 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4670T vs Xeon E5-1603 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4670T

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $84 less on MSRP ($189 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).
✅Delivers 45.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.7 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($189 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-1603 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,460 vs 4,488).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 23.7 PassMark/$ ($273 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4670T better than Xeon E5-1603 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1603 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4670T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4670T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4670T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4670T is the better buy right now. Core i5-4670T comes in $84 cheaper on MSRP at $189 MSRP versus $273 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 45.4% better value on MSRP (23.7 vs 16.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-1603 v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4670T vs Xeon E5-1603 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670T

The Core i5-4670T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,488 points. Launch price was $220.

Xeon E5-1603 v3

The Xeon E5-1603 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,460 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-4670T and Xeon E5-1603 v3 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4670T versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1603 v3 — a 16.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670T (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-4670T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-1603 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670T scores 4,488 against the Xeon E5-1603 v3's 4,460 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-4670T. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670T vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1603 v3.

Feature	Core i5-4670T	Xeon E5-1603 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+18%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.8 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	10 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	4,488	4,460

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4670T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1603 v3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4670T	Xeon E5-1603 v3
Socket	LGA1150	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4670T was priced at $189, while the Xeon E5-1603 v3 came in at $273. On launch pricing ($189 vs $273), Core i5-4670T was $84 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4670T delivers 23.7 pts/$ vs 16.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1603 v3 — making the Core i5-4670T the 37% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4670T	Xeon E5-1603 v3
MSRP	$189-31%	$273
Performance per Dollar	23.7+45%	16.3
Release Date	2013	2014

Search Core i5-4670T on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-1603 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.