Core i5-5575R
VS
Atom C3858

Core i5-5575R vs Atom C3858

Intel

Core i5-5575R

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Atom C3858

12 Cores12 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-5575R is positioned at rank 813 and the Atom C3858 is on rank 310, so the Atom C3858 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-5575R

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16278%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15381%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11168%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3364%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2665%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2331%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1335%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1318%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1200%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1200%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1186%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1154%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1138%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1134%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1123%
#813
Core i5-5575R
MSRP: $265|Avg: $50
100%
#815
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
99%
#816
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
99%
#817
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#818
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
99%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
98%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
97%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
97%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
97%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
97%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
97%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
97%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
96%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3858

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4536%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
856%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
761%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
588%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
99%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
98%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
98%
#310
Atom C3858
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3858 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-5575RAtom C3858
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-5575R (2015) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-5575RAtom C3858
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-5575R and Atom C3858

Intel

Core i5-5575R

The Core i5-5575R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 May 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,074 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Atom C3858

The Atom C3858 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,040 points. Launch price was $332.

Processing Power

The Core i5-5575R packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3858 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Atom C3858 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-5575R versus 2 GHz on the Atom C3858 — a 49.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-5575R (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-5575R uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Atom C3858 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5575R scores 5,074 against the Atom C3858's 5,040 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-5575R. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-5575R vs 12 MB on the Atom C3858.

FeatureCore i5-5575RAtom C3858
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
12 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+65%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+40%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
12 MB+200%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
12 MB+4700%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark
5,074
5,040
Geekbench 6 Single
1,081
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-5575R uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom C3858 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1866 on the Core i5-5575R versus DDR4-2400 on the Atom C3858 — the Atom C3858 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3858 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-5575R) vs 12 (Atom C3858) — the Core i5-5575R offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM87,QM87,Z97,H97 (Core i5-5575R) and Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3858).

FeatureCore i5-5575RAtom C3858
Socket
BGA1364
FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1866
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
256 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-5575R) / not specified (Atom C3858). The Core i5-5575R includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 6200), while the Atom C3858 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-5575R targets All-in-One Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-5575R rivals A10-7870K.

FeatureCore i5-5575RAtom C3858
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
All-in-One Desktop