PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-10700F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 52.1 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($310 MSRP vs $154 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 4600G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 4600G

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $156 less on MSRP ($154 MSRP vs $310 MSRP).
✅Delivers 99.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.8 vs 52.1 PassMark/$ ($154 MSRP vs $310 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Core i7-10700F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,348 vs 12,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).

Core i7-10700F

2020

Ryzen 5 4600G

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $156 less on MSRP ($154 MSRP vs $310 MSRP).
✅Delivers 99.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.8 vs 52.1 PassMark/$ ($154 MSRP vs $310 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Core i7-10700F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 52.1 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($310 MSRP vs $154 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 4600G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,348 vs 12,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10700F better than Ryzen 5 4600G?

Yes. Core i7-10700F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 23.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 28.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 1.0% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-10700F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 23.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-10700F is the better fit. You are getting 28.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-10700F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 4600G makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-10700F is 101.3% more expensive on MSRP at $310 MSRP versus $154 MSRP, and it gives you a 23.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 4600G is also 99.4% better value on MSRP (103.8 vs 52.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 4600G can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-10700F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-10700F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 4600G Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-10700F	Ryzen 5 4600G
1080p
low	292 FPS	214 FPS
medium	259 FPS	171 FPS
high	219 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	239 FPS	183 FPS
medium	191 FPS	145 FPS
high	157 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	166 FPS	74 FPS
medium	135 FPS	63 FPS
high	104 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	91 FPS	39 FPS

Open Core i7-10700F Open Ryzen 5 4600G

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-10700F	Ryzen 5 4600G
1080p
low	403 FPS	308 FPS
medium	403 FPS	263 FPS
high	403 FPS	232 FPS
ultra	363 FPS	199 FPS
1440p
low	403 FPS	268 FPS
medium	403 FPS	234 FPS
high	360 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	180 FPS
4K
low	349 FPS	231 FPS
medium	295 FPS	207 FPS
high	273 FPS	184 FPS
ultra	235 FPS	157 FPS

Open Core i7-10700F Open Ryzen 5 4600G

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-10700F	Ryzen 5 4600G
1080p
low	403 FPS	400 FPS
medium	403 FPS	400 FPS
high	403 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	403 FPS	400 FPS
1440p
low	403 FPS	400 FPS
medium	403 FPS	400 FPS
high	403 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	403 FPS	372 FPS
4K
low	403 FPS	400 FPS
medium	403 FPS	341 FPS
high	396 FPS	293 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	232 FPS

Open Core i7-10700F Open Ryzen 5 4600G

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-10700F	Ryzen 5 4600G
1080p
low	403 FPS	400 FPS
medium	403 FPS	400 FPS
high	403 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	403 FPS	400 FPS
1440p
low	403 FPS	400 FPS
medium	403 FPS	400 FPS
high	403 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	403 FPS	400 FPS
4K
low	403 FPS	400 FPS
medium	403 FPS	400 FPS
high	403 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	403 FPS	338 FPS

Open Core i7-10700F Open Ryzen 5 4600G

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-10700F and Ryzen 5 4600G

Core i7-10700F

The Core i7-10700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 16,139 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 5 4600G

The Ryzen 5 4600G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,985 points. Launch price was $154.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-10700F packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 4600G offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-10700F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700F versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600G — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-10700F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4600G uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700F scores 16,139 against the Ryzen 5 4600G's 15,985 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-10700F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,000 vs 9,348 (24.8% advantage for the Core i7-10700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,250 vs 1,578, a 23.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 4600G that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,800 vs 6,619 (16.4% advantage for the Core i7-10700F). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700F vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600G.

Feature	Core i7-10700F	Ryzen 5 4600G
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+14%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.7 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+100%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark	16,139	15,985
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,000+28%	9,348
Geekbench 6 Single	1,250	1,578+26%
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,800+18%	6,619

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-10700F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 4600G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-10700F) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 4600G) — the Ryzen 5 4600G offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,Z590 (Core i7-10700F) and B450,X470,B550,X570,A520 (Ryzen 5 4600G).

Feature	Core i7-10700F	Ryzen 5 4600G
Socket	LGA1200	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 4600G has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-10700F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 4600G). The Ryzen 5 4600G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 7), while the Core i7-10700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10700F targets Gaming/Content Creation, Ryzen 5 4600G targets Entry Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700F rivals Ryzen 5 5600X; Ryzen 5 4600G rivals Core i5-10400.

Feature	Core i7-10700F	Ryzen 5 4600G
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	Radeon Vega 7
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming/Content Creation	Entry Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-10700F launched at $310 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 4600G debuted at $154. On MSRP ($310 vs $154), the Ryzen 5 4600G is $156 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-10700F delivers 52.1 pts/$ vs 103.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 4600G — making the Ryzen 5 4600G the 66.4% better value option.