Core i7-11375H
VS
Core i7-11370H

Core i7-11375H vs Core i7-11370H

Intel

Core i7-11375H

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 5 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Core i7-11370H

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-11375H is positioned at rank 210 and the Core i7-11370H is on rank 757, so the Core i7-11375H offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-11375H

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
#198
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
375%
#199
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
370%
#200
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
339%
#201
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
338%
#202
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
335%
#204
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
323%
#205
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
310%
#206
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
309%
#207
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
301%
#210
Core i7-11375H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-11370H

#745
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1082%
#746
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1066%
#747
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
979%
#748
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
975%
#749
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
966%
#751
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
932%
#752
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
894%
#753
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
893%
#754
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
869%
#757
Core i7-11370H
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
100%
#761
Core i3-N300
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
99%
#767
Core i7-1250U
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
#772
Core i7-9750HF
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-11375H delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-11370H in both compute-intensive tasks (1.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-11375HCore i7-11370H
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($426)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) / 10 nm SuperFin)
✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) / 10 nm SuperFin)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-11375HCore i7-11370H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($426)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-11375H and Core i7-11370H

Intel

Core i7-11375H

The Core i7-11375H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,732 points. Launch price was $482.

Intel

Core i7-11370H

The Core i7-11370H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,548 points. Launch price was $426.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-11375H and Core i7-11370H share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-11375H versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-11370H — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-11375H (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). Both are built on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture using a 10 nm SuperFin process. In PassMark, the Core i7-11375H scores 11,732 against the Core i7-11370H's 11,548 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i7-11375H. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-11375HCore i7-11370H
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
5 GHz+4%
4.8 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
3 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm SuperFin
10 nm SuperFin
Architecture
Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)
Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)
PassMark
11,732+2%
11,548
Cinebench R23 Multi
5,563
Geekbench 6 Single
1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,612
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1449 socket with PCIe 4.0.

FeatureCore i7-11375HCore i7-11370H
Socket
FCBGA1449
FCBGA1449
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-11375H) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11370H). The Core i7-11370H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Core i7-11375H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11370H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-11370H rivals Ryzen 7 5800H.

FeatureCore i7-11375HCore i7-11370H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Productivity