Core i7-2670QM
VS
Core i3-7100T

Core i7-2670QM vs Core i3-7100T

Intel

Core i7-2670QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-7100T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2670QM is positioned at rank 42 and the Core i3-7100T is on rank 568, so the Core i7-2670QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2670QM

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
95%
#30
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
196%
#31
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
193%
#32
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
177%
#33
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
176%
#34
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
175%
#36
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
169%
#37
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
162%
#38
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
161%
#39
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
157%
#42
Core i7-2670QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
100%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7100T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9693%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9159%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6650%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2003%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1587%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1388%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
795%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
785%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
714%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
714%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
706%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
687%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
678%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
675%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
669%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
100%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
100%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
100%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
99%
#573
Core i5-7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
99%
#574
Core i7-7700
MSRP: $272|Avg: $102
99%
#575
Celeron G1610T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#576
Athlon X4 750K
MSRP: $91|Avg: $17
98%
#577
Core i7-7700K
MSRP: $305|Avg: $140
98%
#578
Core i5-7600K
MSRP: $217|Avg: $84
98%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
97%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
97%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
97%
#583
FX-8370
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7100T (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-2670QMCore i3-7100T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2670QM (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-2670QMCore i3-7100T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2670QM and Core i3-7100T

Intel

Core i7-2670QM

The Core i7-2670QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,748 points. Launch price was $378.

Intel

Core i3-7100T

The Core i3-7100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,763 points. Launch price was $117.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2670QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-7100T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-2670QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2670QM versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-7100T — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-7100T (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-2670QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-7100T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2670QM scores 3,748 against the Core i3-7100T's 3,763 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-7100T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2670QM vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100T.

FeatureCore i7-2670QMCore i3-7100T
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz+10%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.4 GHz+55%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+100%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,748
3,763
Geekbench 6 Single
1,157
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2670QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-7100T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i7-2670QM versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7100T — the Core i7-2670QM supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7100T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2670QM) and B250,H270,Z270 (Core i3-7100T).

FeatureCore i7-2670QMCore i3-7100T
Socket
PGA988
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1600+39900%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
32
64 GB+209715100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-2670QM) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7100T). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2670QM) and Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7100T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2670QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.

FeatureCore i7-2670QMCore i3-7100T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Intel HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Low Power Desktop