Core i7-4610M vs Phenom II X6 1045T

Core i7-4610M vs Phenom II X6 1045T Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4610M

2 / 4

3,251

+0.2%

3,244

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4610M vs Phenom II X6 1045T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4610M vs Phenom II X6 1045T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4610M

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

Phenom II X6 1045T

2010

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4610M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,244 vs 3,251).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4610M better than Phenom II X6 1045T?

Yes. Core i7-4610M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4610M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4610M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4610M still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-4610M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4610M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4610M vs Phenom II X6 1045T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4610M

The Core i7-4610M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $346.

Phenom II X6 1045T

The Phenom II X6 1045T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,244 points. Launch price was $175.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4610M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1045T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1045T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4610M versus 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1045T — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4610M (base: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-4610M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1045T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4610M scores 3,251 against the Phenom II X6 1045T's 3,244 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-4610M. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4610M vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1045T.

Feature	Core i7-4610M	Phenom II X6 1045T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+16%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+11%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Thuban (2010)
PassMark	3,251	3,244

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4610M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1045T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.