Core i7-4610M vs Ryzen Embedded R1600

Intel

Core i7-4610M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1600

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-4610M vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4610M vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4610M vs Ryzen Embedded R1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4610M

2014

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (3,251 vs 3,276).
    • 1948% higher power demand at 512W vs 25W.

    Ryzen Embedded R1600

    2020

    Why buy it

    • +0.8% higher PassMark.
    • Draws 25W instead of 512W, a 487W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen Embedded R1600 better than Core i7-4610M?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4610M is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R1600 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R1600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen Embedded R1600 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen Embedded R1600 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen Embedded R1600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core i7-4610M vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i7-4610M

    The Core i7-4610M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $346.

    AMD

    Ryzen Embedded R1600

    The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Core i7-4610M and Ryzen Embedded R1600 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4610M versus 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 — a 17.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-4610M (base: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-4610M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4610M scores 3,251 against the Ryzen Embedded R1600's 3,276 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1600. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureCore i7-4610MRyzen Embedded R1600
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    3.7 GHz+19%
    3.1 GHz
    Base Clock
    3 GHz+15%
    2.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    4 MB (total)
    4 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)
    512 kB (per core)+100%
    Process
    22 nm
    14 nm-36%
    Architecture
    Haswell (2013−2015)
    Zen (2017−2020)
    PassMark
    3,251
    3,276
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i7-4610M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i7-4610MRyzen Embedded R1600
    Socket
    PGA946
    FP5
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0