Core i7-4610M vs Xeon W3570

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4610M vs Xeon W3570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4610M vs Xeon W3570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4610M

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3570 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,251 vs 3,267).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3570, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌293.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 130W.

Xeon W3570

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
✅Draws 130W instead of 512W, a 382W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $999 MSRP, while Core i7-4610M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W3570 better than Core i7-4610M?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3570 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4610M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W3570 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3570 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W3570 is the better buy right now. Xeon W3570 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $999 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (3.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4610M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4610M vs Xeon W3570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4610M

The Core i7-4610M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $346.

Xeon W3570

The Xeon W3570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $480.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4610M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon W3570 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon W3570 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4610M versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3570 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-4610M (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-4610M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W3570 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4610M scores 3,251 against the Xeon W3570's 3,267 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W3570. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4610M vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3570.

Feature	Core i7-4610M	Xeon W3570
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+7%	3.46 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.2 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	3,251	3,267

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4610M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3570 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.