Core i7-4800MQ vs Core i5-7600T

Core i7-4800MQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2013

Core i5-7600T

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-4800MQ

4 / 8

5,773

0.0%

5,827

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4800MQ is positioned at rank 971 and the Core i5-7600T is on rank 591, so the Core i5-7600T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4800MQ

#959

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1932%

#960

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1903%

#961

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1747%

#962

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1739%

#963

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1723%

#965

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1664%

#966

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1596%

#967

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1593%

#968

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1550%

#971

Core i7-4800MQ

MSRP: $380|Avg: $378

100%

#977

Phenom II X2 N640

MSRP: $100|Avg: $55

99%

#978

A10-8700P

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

99%

#982

Athlon II Neo K125

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

98%

#986

Pro A8-8600B

MSRP: $150|Avg: $25

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7600T

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

10271%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

9705%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

7046%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

2123%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

1681%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

1471%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

843%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

831%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

757%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

757%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

749%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

728%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

718%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

715%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

709%

#382

Ryzen Embedded R2544

MSRP: $280|Avg: $280

100%

#591

Core i5-7600T

MSRP: $192|Avg: $60

100%

#593

Core i3-7300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $128

99%

#594

Celeron G1830

MSRP: $52|Avg: $5

99%

#596

Core i3-4160

MSRP: $117|Avg: $52

99%

#598

FX-8350

MSRP: $199|Avg: $130

98%

#599

Athlon X4 760K

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

98%

#600

Core i5-6400

MSRP: $182|Avg: $57

98%

#602

Pentium G3460T

MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A

97%

#603

Core i3-6300

MSRP: $147|Avg: $99

97%

#604

Core i5-6402P

MSRP: $182|Avg: $120

97%

#605

Athlon II X4 620e

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

97%

#606

Core i5-7600

MSRP: $224|Avg: $114

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-7600T (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Core i7-4800MQ	Core i5-7600T
Gaming	Balanced gaming performance	Balanced gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($378)	✅ More affordable ($60)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)	✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4800MQ (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Core i7-4800MQ	Core i5-7600T
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+536%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($378)	✅ More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-4800MQ Benchmark Check

Core i5-7600T Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4800MQ and Core i5-7600T

Core i7-4800MQ

The Core i7-4800MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,773 points. Launch price was $378.

Core i5-7600T

The Core i5-7600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,827 points. Launch price was $224.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4800MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-7600T's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4800MQ versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-7600T — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-4800MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-7600T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4800MQ scores 5,773 against the Core i5-7600T's 5,827 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-7600T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4800MQ vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7600T.

Feature	Core i7-4800MQ	Core i5-7600T
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	2.8 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+33%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	5,773	5,827
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,243

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4800MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7600T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4800MQ	Core i5-7600T
Socket	PGA946	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4800MQ) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7600T). The Core i5-7600T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-4800MQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7600T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7600T rivals Ryzen 3 1300X.

Feature	Core i7-4800MQ	Core i5-7600T
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics 630
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Low Power Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-4800MQ launched at $380 MSRP, while the Core i5-7600T debuted at $192. At current prices ($378 vs $60), the Core i5-7600T is $318 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4800MQ delivers 15.3 pts/$ vs 97.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-7600T — making the Core i5-7600T the 145.6% better value option.