Core i7-4800MQ
VS
Core i7-3820

Core i7-4800MQ vs Core i7-3820

Intel

Core i7-4800MQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i7-3820

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4800MQ is positioned at rank 971 and the Core i7-3820 is on rank 791, so the Core i7-3820 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4800MQ

#959
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1932%
#960
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1903%
#961
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1747%
#962
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1739%
#963
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1723%
#965
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1664%
#966
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1596%
#967
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1593%
#968
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1550%
#971
Core i7-4800MQ
MSRP: $380|Avg: $378
100%
#977
Phenom II X2 N640
MSRP: $100|Avg: $55
99%
#978
A10-8700P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
99%
#982
Athlon II Neo K125
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#986
Pro A8-8600B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3820

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15409%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14560%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10571%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3185%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2523%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2207%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1264%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1247%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1136%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1136%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1123%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1093%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1077%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1073%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1063%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
97%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
100%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
100%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#794
Core i3-3245
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
99%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
98%
#798
Athlon II X3 415e
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#799
Core i5-2300
MSRP: $177|Avg: $17
97%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
97%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
97%
#803
Core i5-4460T
MSRP: $187|Avg: $30
96%
#804
Core i3-3220
MSRP: $117|Avg: $88
96%
#805
Core i7-3770T
MSRP: $278|Avg: $105
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-3820 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-4800MQ in both compute-intensive tasks (0.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-4800MQCore i7-3820
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i7-3820 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 92% cheaper ($30 vs $378) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i7-4800MQCore i7-3820
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1163%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-3820

Intel

Core i7-4800MQ

The Core i7-4800MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,773 points. Launch price was $378.

Intel

Core i7-3820

The Core i7-3820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Fevereiro 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,787 points. Launch price was $400.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4800MQ and Core i7-3820 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4800MQ versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3820 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-3820 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-4800MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-3820 uses Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4800MQ scores 5,773 against the Core i7-3820's 5,787 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-3820. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4800MQ vs 10240 kB (total) on the Core i7-3820.

FeatureCore i7-4800MQCore i7-3820
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
10240 kB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
PassMark
5,773
5,787
Geekbench 6 Single
624
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4800MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3820 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4800MQCore i7-3820
Socket
PGA946
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4800MQ) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3820). Primary use case: Core i7-3820 targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3820 rivals FX-8350.

FeatureCore i7-4800MQCore i7-3820
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
HEDT Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-4800MQ launched at $380 MSRP, while the Core i7-3820 debuted at $286. At current prices ($378 vs $30), the Core i7-3820 is $348 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4800MQ delivers 15.3 pts/$ vs 192.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-3820 — making the Core i7-3820 the 170.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4800MQCore i7-3820
MSRP
$380
$286-25%
Avg Price (30d)
$378
$30-92%
Performance per Dollar
15.3
192.9+1161%
Release Date
2013
2012