Core i7-620LM vs Phenom II X3 700e

Intel

Core i7-620LM

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Phenom II X3 700e

3 Cores3 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-620LM vs Phenom II X3 700e Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-620LM vs Phenom II X3 700e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-620LM vs Phenom II X3 700e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-620LM

2010

Why buy it

  • +80% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Phenom II X3 700e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).

Phenom II X3 700e

2009

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Costs $175 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 138.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.6 vs 4.9 PassMark/$ ($125 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (250 vs 450).
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (650 vs 900).
  • 160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-620LM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-620LM better than Phenom II X3 700e?
Yes. Core i7-620LM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 38.5% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-620LM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-620LM is the stronger fit. You are getting 38.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-620LM is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-620LM comes in 140.0% more expensive on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $125 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Phenom II X3 700e only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 138.0% better value on paper (11.6 vs 4.9 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-620LM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-620LM vs Phenom II X3 700e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-620LM

The Core i7-620LM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,463 points. Launch price was $300.

AMD

Phenom II X3 700e

The Phenom II X3 700e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,451 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-620LM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X3 700e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom II X3 700e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-620LM versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom II X3 700e — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-620LM (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-620LM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom II X3 700e uses Heka (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-620LM scores 1,463 against the Phenom II X3 700e's 1,451 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-620LM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 250, a 57.1% lead for the Core i7-620LM that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 900 vs 650 (32.3% advantage for the Core i7-620LM). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-620LM vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 700e.

FeatureCore i7-620LMPhenom II X3 700e
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+17%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Heka (2009−2010)
PassMark
1,463
1,451
Geekbench 6 Single
450+80%
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
900+38%
650
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-620LM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X3 700e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core i7-620LM versus DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X3 700e — the Phenom II X3 700e supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Phenom II X3 700e supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: QM57,HM55 (Core i7-620LM) and AM3,AM2+ (Phenom II X3 700e).

FeatureCore i7-620LMPhenom II X3 700e
Socket
BGA1288
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Phenom II X3 700e has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-620LM) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X3 700e). The Core i7-620LM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Phenom II X3 700e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-620LM targets Budget, Phenom II X3 700e targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-620LM rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.

FeatureCore i7-620LMPhenom II X3 700e
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-620LM was priced at $300, while the Phenom II X3 700e came in at $125. On launch pricing ($300 vs $125), Phenom II X3 700e was $175 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-620LM delivers 4.9 pts/$ vs 11.6 pts/$ for the Phenom II X3 700e — making the Phenom II X3 700e the 81.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-620LMPhenom II X3 700e
MSRP
$300
$125-58%
Performance per Dollar
4.9
11.6+137%
Release Date
2010
2009

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.