Core i7-6822EQ vs Ryzen 5 3600

CPU

GPU

Core i7-6822EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2015

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i7-6822EQ vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-6822EQ

4 / 8

5,550

0.0%

17,685

+218.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6822EQ vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6822EQ vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6822EQ

2015

Why buy it

✅+47.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 530, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.9 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +94.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $95 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 370.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 18.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 2,796).
❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6822EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Core i7-6822EQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 5 3600 is ahead with a 94.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6822EQ pulls ahead with 47.3% better Geekbench multi-core. Ryzen 5 3600 also has the bigger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6822EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 47.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 3600 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 3600 comes in $95 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 94.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-6822EQ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 47.3% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 370.8% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 18.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and 300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-6822EQ vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6822EQ

The Core i7-6822EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $378.

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-6822EQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i7-6822EQ versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 71% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600. The Core i7-6822EQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6822EQ scores 5,550 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 104.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 684 vs 1,295, a 61.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,796 vs 1,898 (38.3% advantage for the Core i7-6822EQ). L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-6822EQ vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i7-6822EQ	Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	2 GHz	4.2 GHz+110%
Base Clock	—	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB	32 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	5,550	17,685+219%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	9,500
Geekbench 6 Single	684	1,295+89%
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,796+47%	1,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i7-6822EQ versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-6822EQ) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Skylake-H Platform (Core i7-6822EQ) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

Feature	Core i7-6822EQ	Ryzen 5 3600
Socket	—	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866	DDR4-3200+50%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i7-6822EQ) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Core i7-6822EQ includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6822EQ targets Embedded, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

Feature	Core i7-6822EQ	Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 530	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x / VT-d / EPT	Yes
Target Use	Embedded	Gaming/Budget Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-6822EQ was priced at $294, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($294 vs $199), Ryzen 5 3600 was $95 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6822EQ delivers 18.9 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 129.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-6822EQ	Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP	$294	$199-32%
Performance per Dollar	18.9	88.9+370%
Release Date	2015	2019

Search Core i7-6822EQ on Amazon

Search Ryzen 5 3600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.