Core i7-6822EQ vs Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel

Core i7-6822EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 5600X

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2020
Ryzen family
·······

Core i7-6822EQ vs Ryzen 5 5600X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6822EQ vs Ryzen 5 5600X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6822EQ vs Ryzen 5 5600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6822EQ

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $5 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 530, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (5,550 vs 21,845).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.9 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Ryzen 5 5600X

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +97.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Delivers 287.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 18.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
  • 50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 1.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $299 MSRPvs$294 MSRP
  • 160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6822EQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Core i7-6822EQ?
Yes. Ryzen 5 5600X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 97.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 293.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 5600X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 97.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 5600X is the stronger fit. You are getting 293.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 5600X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 5600X comes in 1.7% more expensive on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 97.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 287.0% better value on MSRP (73.1 vs 18.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 5600X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015), 300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-6822EQ vs Ryzen 5 5600X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-6822EQ

The Core i7-6822EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $378.

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600X

The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i7-6822EQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 5600X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i7-6822EQ versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 78.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X. The Core i7-6822EQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6822EQ scores 5,550 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 119% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-6822EQ vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.

FeatureCore i7-6822EQRyzen 5 5600X
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
4.6 GHz+130%
Base Clock
3.7 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB
32 MB+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB
512K (per core)+51100%
Process
14 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark
5,550
21,845+294%
Geekbench 6 Single
684
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,796
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i7-6822EQ versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the Ryzen 5 5600X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-6822EQ) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Skylake-H Platform (Core i7-6822EQ) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).

FeatureCore i7-6822EQRyzen 5 5600X
Socket
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866
DDR4-3200+50%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
128 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
24+50%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i7-6822EQ) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). The Core i7-6822EQ includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530), while the Ryzen 5 5600X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6822EQ targets Embedded, Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-6822EQRyzen 5 5600X
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 530
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Embedded
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-6822EQ was priced at $294, while the Ryzen 5 5600X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($294 vs $299), Core i7-6822EQ was $5 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6822EQ delivers 18.9 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 117.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-6822EQRyzen 5 5600X
MSRP
$294-2%
$299
Performance per Dollar
18.9
73.1+287%
Release Date
2015
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.