Core i7-7Y75 vs Phenom II X4 B97

Core i7-7Y75 vs Phenom II X4 B97 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-7Y75

2 / 4

2,534

0.0%

2,540

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7Y75 vs Phenom II X4 B97 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7Y75 vs Phenom II X4 B97: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7Y75

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 95W, a 91W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,534 vs 2,540).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 25.4 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Phenom II X4 B97

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $293 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Delivers 293.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.4 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 4.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7Y75 better than Phenom II X4 B97?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-7Y75 is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 B97 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Phenom II X4 B97 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 B97 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7Y75 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-7Y75 comes in 293.0% more expensive on MSRP at $393 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Phenom II X4 B97 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 293.9% better value on paper (25.4 vs 6.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7Y75 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-7Y75 vs Phenom II X4 B97 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7Y75

The Core i7-7Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,534 points. Launch price was $393.

Phenom II X4 B97

The Phenom II X4 B97 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,540 points. Launch price was $100.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-7Y75 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X4 B97 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 B97 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-7Y75 versus 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X4 B97 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-7Y75 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-7Y75 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X4 B97 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7Y75 scores 2,534 against the Phenom II X4 B97's 2,540 — a 0.2% lead for the Phenom II X4 B97. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-7Y75 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 B97.

Feature	Core i7-7Y75	Phenom II X4 B97
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	3.2 GHz+146%
L3 Cache	4 MB	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,534	2,540

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7Y75 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 B97 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-7Y75	Phenom II X4 B97
Socket	FCBGA1515	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-7Y75 was priced at $393, while the Phenom II X4 B97 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($393 vs $100), Phenom II X4 B97 was $293 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7Y75 delivers 6.4 pts/$ vs 25.4 pts/$ for the Phenom II X4 B97 — making the Phenom II X4 B97 the 119% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-7Y75	Phenom II X4 B97
MSRP	$393	$100-75%
Performance per Dollar	6.4	25.4+297%
Release Date	2016	2010

Search Core i7-7Y75 on Amazon

Search Phenom II X4 B97 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.