Celeron M P4500 vs Core i7-7Y75

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M P4500 vs Core i7-7Y75 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M P4500 vs Core i7-7Y75: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M P4500

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,533 vs 2,534).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌11277.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 4.5W.

Core i7-7Y75

2016

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 5W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $393 MSRP, while Celeron M P4500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7Y75 better than Celeron M P4500?

Yes. Core i7-7Y75 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-7Y75 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7Y75 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7Y75 is the better buy right now. Core i7-7Y75 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $393 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7Y75 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010), 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M P4500 vs Core i7-7Y75 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M P4500

The Celeron M P4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,533 points. Launch price was $86.

Core i7-7Y75

The Core i7-7Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,534 points. Launch price was $393.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M P4500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-7Y75's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M P4500 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-7Y75 — a 63.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-7Y75. The Celeron M P4500 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-7Y75 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M P4500 scores 2,533 against the Core i7-7Y75's 2,534 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-7Y75. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron M P4500 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7Y75.

Feature	Celeron M P4500	Core i7-7Y75
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	3.6 GHz+94%
Base Clock	—	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,533	2,534

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M P4500 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-7Y75 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.