Celeron M P4500 vs Core i3-4100M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M P4500 vs Core i3-4100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M P4500 vs Core i3-4100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M P4500

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4100M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-4100M

2013

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Celeron M P4500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,531 vs 2,533).
❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Celeron M P4500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4100M better than Celeron M P4500?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4100M is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M P4500 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core i3-4100M also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M P4500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4100M is the better buy right now. Core i3-4100M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $225 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron M P4500 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4100M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M P4500 vs Core i3-4100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M P4500

The Celeron M P4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,533 points. Launch price was $86.

Core i3-4100M

The Core i3-4100M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,531 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M P4500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4100M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M P4500 versus 2.5 GHz on the Core i3-4100M — a 29.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-4100M. The Celeron M P4500 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4100M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M P4500 scores 2,533 against the Core i3-4100M's 2,531 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron M P4500. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron M P4500 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-4100M.

Feature	Celeron M P4500	Core i3-4100M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	2.5 GHz+34%
Base Clock	—	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,533	2,531

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M P4500 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4100M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron M P4500	Core i3-4100M
Socket	PGA988	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron M P4500) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4100M). The Core i3-4100M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Celeron M P4500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4100M targets Mobile.