Celeron M P4500 vs Xeon X3370

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M P4500 vs Xeon X3370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M P4500 vs Xeon X3370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M P4500

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,533 vs 2,544).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

Xeon X3370

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X3370 better than Celeron M P4500?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3370 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron M P4500 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X3370 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X3370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark. It also has the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X3370 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X3370 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron M P4500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M P4500 vs Xeon X3370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M P4500

The Celeron M P4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,533 points. Launch price was $86.

Xeon X3370

The Xeon X3370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,544 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M P4500 is built on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron M P4500 scores 2,533 against the Xeon X3370's 2,544 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon X3370. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron M P4500 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3370.

Feature	Celeron M P4500	Xeon X3370
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	12 MB L2 Cache+500%
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	—
PassMark	2,533	2,544

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M P4500 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X3370 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.