Celeron M P4500 vs Core i5-750

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M P4500 vs Core i5-750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M P4500 vs Core i5-750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M P4500

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-750 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,533 vs 2,546).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-750.

Core i5-750

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron M P4500.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $210 MSRP, while Celeron M P4500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-750 better than Celeron M P4500?

Yes. Core i5-750 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-750 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-750 is the better buy right now. Core i5-750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $210 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron M P4500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M P4500 vs Core i5-750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M P4500

The Celeron M P4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,533 points. Launch price was $86.

Core i5-750

The Core i5-750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,546 points. Launch price was $150.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M P4500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-750 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M P4500 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-750 — a 53% clock advantage for the Core i5-750. The Celeron M P4500 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-750 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M P4500 scores 2,533 against the Core i5-750's 2,546 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-750. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron M P4500 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-750.

Feature	Celeron M P4500	Core i5-750
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	3.2 GHz+72%
Base Clock	—	2.66 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	8 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	2,533	2,546
Geekbench 6 Single	—	424

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M P4500 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-750 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron M P4500	Core i5-750
Socket	PGA988	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	16 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron M P4500) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-750). Primary use case: Core i5-750 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-750 rivals Phenom II X4 965.