Celeron 7305 vs Celeron M P4500

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 7305 vs Celeron M P4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 7305 vs Celeron M P4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 7305

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of PGA988 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,520 vs 2,533).
❌Launch MSRP is still $128 MSRP, while Celeron M P4500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Celeron M P4500

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 7305 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on PGA988, while Celeron 7305 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 7305 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 7305 better than Celeron M P4500?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 7305 is ahead with a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M P4500 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Celeron 7305 also has the bigger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M P4500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 7305 is the better buy right now. Celeron 7305 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $128 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron M P4500 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 7305 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2010), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of PGA988, and 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron 7305 vs Celeron M P4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 7305

The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron M P4500

The Celeron M P4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,533 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 7305 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Celeron M P4500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron 7305 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 versus 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M P4500 — a 51.4% clock advantage for the Celeron M P4500. The Celeron 7305 uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Celeron M P4500 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 7305 scores 2,520 against the Celeron M P4500's 2,533 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron M P4500. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Celeron 7305 vs 2 MB on the Celeron M P4500.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Celeron M P4500
Cores / Threads	5 / 5+150%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.1 GHz	1.86 GHz+69%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+300%	2 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB
Process	Intel 7 nm-78%	32 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-U (2022)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,520	2,533
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,422	—
Geekbench 6 Single	641	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,598	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 7305 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Celeron M P4500 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Celeron M P4500
Socket	FCBGA1744	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 7305) / not specified (Celeron M P4500). The Celeron 7305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 12th Gen), while the Celeron M P4500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 7305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U.