PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 7305 vs Core i3-4100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 7305 vs Core i3-4100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 7305

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Costs $97 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 75.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.7 vs 11.2 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,520 vs 2,531).

Core i3-4100M

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 7305 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.2 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on PGA946, while Celeron 7305 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 7305 better than Core i3-4100M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 7305 is ahead with a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4100M pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Celeron 7305 also has the bigger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4100M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 7305 is the better buy right now. Celeron 7305 comes in $97 cheaper on MSRP at $128 MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-4100M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 75.0% better value on MSRP (19.7 vs 11.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 7305 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2013), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of PGA946, and 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron 7305 vs Core i3-4100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 7305

The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-4100M

The Core i3-4100M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,531 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 7305 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Core i3-4100M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron 7305 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 versus 2.5 GHz on the Core i3-4100M — a 77.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-4100M. The Celeron 7305 uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i3-4100M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 7305 scores 2,520 against the Core i3-4100M's 2,531 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-4100M. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Celeron 7305 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-4100M.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i3-4100M
Cores / Threads	5 / 5+150%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.1 GHz	2.5 GHz+127%
Base Clock	—	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+167%	3 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-U (2022)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,520	2,531
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,422	—
Geekbench 6 Single	641	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,598	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 7305 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i3-4100M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron 7305 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4100M — the Celeron 7305 supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 7305 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron 7305) vs 16 (Core i3-4100M) — the Celeron 7305 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i3-4100M
Socket	FCBGA1744	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+200%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics for 12th Gen (Celeron 7305) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4100M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 7305 targets Budget, Core i3-4100M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i3-4100M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics for 12th Gen	HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 7305 was priced at $128, while the Core i3-4100M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($128 vs $225), Celeron 7305 was $97 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 7305 delivers 19.7 pts/$ vs 11.2 pts/$ for the Core i3-4100M — making the Celeron 7305 the 54.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i3-4100M
MSRP	$128-43%	$225
Performance per Dollar	19.7+76%	11.2
Release Date	2022	2013

Search Celeron 7305 on Amazon

Search Core i3-4100M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.