PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 7305 vs Core i7-7Y75 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 7305 vs Core i7-7Y75: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 7305

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $265 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Delivers 205.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.7 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1515 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,520 vs 2,534).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 15W vs 4.5W.

Core i7-7Y75

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 5W instead of 15W, a 11W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 7305 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1515, while Celeron 7305 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 7305 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 7305 better than Core i7-7Y75?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 7305 is ahead with a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7Y75 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Celeron 7305 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7Y75 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 7305 is the better buy right now. Celeron 7305 comes in $265 cheaper on MSRP at $128 MSRP versus $393 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-7Y75 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 205.3% better value on MSRP (19.7 vs 6.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 7305 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1515, and 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron 7305 vs Core i7-7Y75 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 7305

The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-7Y75

The Core i7-7Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,534 points. Launch price was $393.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 7305 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Core i7-7Y75 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron 7305 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-7Y75 — a 106.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-7Y75. The Celeron 7305 uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-7Y75 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 7305 scores 2,520 against the Core i7-7Y75's 2,534 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-7Y75. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Celeron 7305 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7Y75.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i7-7Y75
Cores / Threads	5 / 5+150%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+227%
Base Clock	—	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-U (2022)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,520	2,534
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,422	—
Geekbench 6 Single	641	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,598	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 7305 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-7Y75 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i7-7Y75
Socket	FCBGA1744	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 7305) / not specified (Core i7-7Y75). The Celeron 7305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 12th Gen), while the Core i7-7Y75 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 7305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i7-7Y75
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics for 12th Gen	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 7305 was priced at $128, while the Core i7-7Y75 came in at $393. On launch pricing ($128 vs $393), Celeron 7305 was $265 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 7305 delivers 19.7 pts/$ vs 6.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-7Y75 — making the Celeron 7305 the 101.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Core i7-7Y75
MSRP	$128-67%	$393
Performance per Dollar	19.7+208%	6.4
Release Date	2022	2016

Search Celeron 7305 on Amazon

Search Core i7-7Y75 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.