Celeron 7305 vs Core i7-7Y75
Celeron 7305
Core i7-7Y75
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 7305 is positioned at rank 890 and the Core i7-7Y75 is on rank 1181, so the Celeron 7305 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 7305
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-7Y75
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 7305 | Core i7-7Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($107) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($285) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-U (2022) / Intel 7 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 7305 | Core i7-7Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+165%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($107) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($285) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 7305 and Core i7-7Y75
Celeron 7305
The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i7-7Y75
The Core i7-7Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,534 points. Launch price was $393.
Processing Power
The Celeron 7305 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Core i7-7Y75 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron 7305 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-7Y75 — a 106.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-7Y75. The Celeron 7305 uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-7Y75 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 7305 scores 2,520 against the Core i7-7Y75's 2,534 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-7Y75. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Celeron 7305 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7Y75.
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Core i7-7Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 5+150% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+227% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-U (2022) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,520 | 2,534 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,422 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 641 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,598 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 7305 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-7Y75 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Core i7-7Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1515 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 7305) / not specified (Core i7-7Y75). The Celeron 7305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 12th Gen), while the Core i7-7Y75 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 7305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U.
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Core i7-7Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics for 12th Gen | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 7305 launched at $128 MSRP, while the Core i7-7Y75 debuted at $393. At current prices ($107 vs $285), the Celeron 7305 is $178 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 7305 delivers 23.6 pts/$ vs 8.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-7Y75 — making the Celeron 7305 the 90.4% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Core i7-7Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $128-67% | $393 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $107-62% | $285 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.6+165% | 8.9 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 7305 and Core i7-7Y75
