Celeron 7305 vs Phenom II X2 N620

Celeron 7305 vs Phenom II X2 N620 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 7305

5 / 5

2,520

+0.7%

2,503

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 7305 vs Phenom II X2 N620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 7305 vs Phenom II X2 N620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 7305

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of S1 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 12th Gen, while Phenom II X2 N620 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $128 MSRP, while Phenom II X2 N620 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌650% higher power demand at 15W vs 2W.

Phenom II X2 N620

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 15W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,503 vs 2,520).
❌Older platform position on S1, while Celeron 7305 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 7305 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 7305 better than Phenom II X2 N620?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Phenom II X2 N620 is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 7305 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 7305 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 5 cores and 5 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 7305 is the better buy right now. Celeron 7305 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $128 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Phenom II X2 N620 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 7305 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2010), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of S1, and more multi-core headroom with 5 cores / 5 threads instead of 2/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron 7305 vs Phenom II X2 N620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 7305

The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom II X2 N620

The Phenom II X2 N620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,503 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 7305 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Phenom II X2 N620 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron 7305 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X2 N620 — a 87.2% clock advantage for the Phenom II X2 N620. The Celeron 7305 uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Phenom II X2 N620 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 7305 scores 2,520 against the Phenom II X2 N620's 2,503 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron 7305.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Phenom II X2 N620
Cores / Threads	5 / 5+150%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.1 GHz	2.8 GHz+155%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm-84%	45 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-U (2022)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,520	2,503
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,422	—
Geekbench 6 Single	641	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,598	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 7305 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Phenom II X2 N620 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Phenom II X2 N620
Socket	FCBGA1744	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 7305) / not specified (Phenom II X2 N620). The Celeron 7305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 12th Gen), while the Phenom II X2 N620 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 7305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U.