Celeron 7305 vs Phenom II X4 B97

Celeron 7305 vs Phenom II X4 B97 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 7305

5 / 5

2,520

0.0%

2,540

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 7305 vs Phenom II X4 B97 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 7305 vs Phenom II X4 B97: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 7305

2022

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM3 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 12th Gen, while Phenom II X4 B97 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,520 vs 2,540).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 25.4 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Phenom II X4 B97

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $28 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.4 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on AM3, while Celeron 7305 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 7305 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X4 B97 better than Celeron 7305?

Yes. Phenom II X4 B97 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X4 B97 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 B97 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X4 B97 is the better buy right now. Phenom II X4 B97 comes in $28 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 29.0% better value on MSRP (25.4 vs 19.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 7305 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2010), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of AM3, and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron 7305 vs Phenom II X4 B97 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 7305

The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom II X4 B97

The Phenom II X4 B97 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,540 points. Launch price was $100.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 7305 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Phenom II X4 B97 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron 7305 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 versus 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X4 B97 — a 97.7% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 B97. The Celeron 7305 uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Phenom II X4 B97 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 7305 scores 2,520 against the Phenom II X4 B97's 2,540 — a 0.8% lead for the Phenom II X4 B97. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Celeron 7305 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 B97.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Phenom II X4 B97
Cores / Threads	5 / 5+25%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	1.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+191%
Base Clock	—	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+33%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-84%	45 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-U (2022)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,520	2,540
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,422	—
Geekbench 6 Single	641	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,598	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 7305 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Phenom II X4 B97 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Phenom II X4 B97
Socket	FCBGA1744	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 7305) / not specified (Phenom II X4 B97). The Celeron 7305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 12th Gen), while the Phenom II X4 B97 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 7305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Phenom II X4 B97
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics for 12th Gen	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 7305 was priced at $128, while the Phenom II X4 B97 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($128 vs $100), Phenom II X4 B97 was $28 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 7305 delivers 19.7 pts/$ vs 25.4 pts/$ for the Phenom II X4 B97 — making the Phenom II X4 B97 the 25.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 7305	Phenom II X4 B97
MSRP	$128	$100-22%
Performance per Dollar	19.7	25.4+29%
Release Date	2022	2010

Search Celeron 7305 on Amazon

Search Phenom II X4 B97 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.