Celeron M P4500 vs Core i5-4310U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M P4500 vs Core i5-4310U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M P4500 vs Core i5-4310U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M P4500

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Core i5-4310U

2014

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,525 vs 2,533).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M P4500 better than Core i5-4310U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-4310U is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M P4500 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Core i5-4310U also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M P4500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M P4500 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron M P4500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4310U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010) and 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M P4500 vs Core i5-4310U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M P4500

The Celeron M P4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,533 points. Launch price was $86.

Core i5-4310U

The Core i5-4310U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,525 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M P4500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4310U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M P4500 versus 3 GHz on the Core i5-4310U — a 46.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-4310U. The Celeron M P4500 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4310U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M P4500 scores 2,533 against the Core i5-4310U's 2,525 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron M P4500. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron M P4500 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4310U.

Feature	Celeron M P4500	Core i5-4310U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	3 GHz+61%
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,533	2,525

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M P4500 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4310U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.