Core i7-9750HF vs Core 3 N355
Core i7-9750HF
Core 3 N355
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-9750HF is positioned at rank 772 and the Core 3 N355 is on rank 625, so the Core 3 N355 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9750HF
Performance Per Dollar Core 3 N355
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-9750HF | Core 3 N355 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($395) | ✅ More affordable ($300) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-HR (2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Twin Lake (2024−2025) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-9750HF | Core 3 N355 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+33%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($395) | ✅ More affordable ($300) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9750HF and Core 3 N355
Core i7-9750HF
The Core i7-9750HF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 10,393 points. Launch price was $149.
Core 3 N355
The Core 3 N355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,502 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9750HF packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core 3 N355 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core 3 N355 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-9750HF versus 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N355 — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9750HF (base: 2.6 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Core i7-9750HF uses the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 3 N355 uses Twin Lake (2024−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9750HF scores 10,393 against the Core 3 N355's 10,502 — a 1% lead for the Core 3 N355. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9750HF vs 6 MB (total) on the Core 3 N355.
| Feature | Core i7-9750HF | Core 3 N355 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 8+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+15% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+2500% | 0.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+100% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-HR (2019) | Twin Lake (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 10,393 | 10,502+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 6,915 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,120 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,149 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9750HF uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 3 N355 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9750HF | Core 3 N355 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | FCBGA1264 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-9750HF) / not specified (Core 3 N355).
| Feature | Core i7-9750HF | Core 3 N355 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9750HF launched at $395 MSRP, while the Core 3 N355 debuted at $300. At current prices ($395 vs $300), the Core 3 N355 is $95 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9750HF delivers 26.3 pts/$ vs 35.0 pts/$ for the Core 3 N355 — making the Core 3 N355 the 28.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9750HF | Core 3 N355 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $395 | $300-24% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $395 | $300-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.3 | 35.0+33% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-9750HF and Core 3 N355
