Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 3700X

CPU

GPU

Core i9-10900E

10 Cores20 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2020

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

Core i9-10900E

10 / 20

19,332

0.0%

Core i5-11300H

Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition

22,430

+16.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10900E

2020

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,332 vs 22,430).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($488 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Costs $159 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
✅Delivers 72.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 39.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Core i9-10900E?

Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 24.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 16% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 24.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 16% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in $159 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $488 MSRP, and it still gives you a 24.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 72.1% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 39.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i9-10900E can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-10900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900E

The Core i9-10900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,332 points. Launch price was $488.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900E packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i9-10900E versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-10900E uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900E scores 19,332 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 14.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900E vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Core i9-10900E	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+7%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.6 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	32 MB+60%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	19,332	22,430+16%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10900E uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900E versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i9-10900E) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i9-10900E) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	Core i9-10900E	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	LGA1200	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	DDR4-3200+9%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900E) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Core i9-10900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i9-10900E	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-10900E was priced at $488, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($488 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $159 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900E delivers 39.6 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 53% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-10900E	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$488	$329-33%
Performance per Dollar	39.6	68.2+72%
Release Date	2020	2019

Search Core i9-10900E on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.