Core i9-13900E vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

CPU

GPU

Core i9-13900E

24 Cores32 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

16 Cores32 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Threadripper Pro family

··

Buy on Amazon

Core i9-13900E vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Performance Spectrum

Core i9-13900E

24 / 32

40,476

+1.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

16 / 32

39,929

0.0%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS

Ryzen 5 7500F

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900E vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900E vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900E

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $595 less on MSRP ($554 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 110.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($554 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

2020

Why buy it

✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (39,929 vs 40,476).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.8 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900E better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13900E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900E is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900E is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900E comes in $595 cheaper on MSRP at $554 MSRP versus $1,149 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 110.2% better value on MSRP (73.1 vs 34.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900E vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900E

The Core i9-13900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,476 points. Launch price was $499.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,929 points. Launch price was $1,149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900E packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900E has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-13900E versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900E (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i9-13900E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900E scores 40,476 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX's 39,929 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i9-13900E. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900E vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+50%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+21%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.9 GHz+117%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	64 MB+78%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-30%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Castle Peak (2020)
PassMark	40,476+1%	39,929
Geekbench 6 Single	2,606	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900E versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — the Core i9-13900E supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900E) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900E) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W680,Q670,Z790,H770 (Core i9-13900E) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX).

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Socket	LGA1700	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+75%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900E) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX). The Core i9-13900E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX rivals Xeon Silver 4314.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900E was priced at $554, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX came in at $1149. On launch pricing ($554 vs $1149), Core i9-13900E was $595 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900E delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 34.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — making the Core i9-13900E the 71.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900E	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
MSRP	$554-52%	$1149
Performance per Dollar	73.1+110%	34.8
Release Date	2023	2020

Search Core i9-13900E on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.