Core i9-13900H vs Ryzen 7 3700X

Core i9-13900H vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

Core i9-13900H

14 / 20

27,444

+22.4%

22,430

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900H vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900H vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900H

2023

Why buy it

✅+22.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Costs $288 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 44.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 27,444).
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900H better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 3700X is ahead with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900H pulls ahead with 22.4% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 3700X also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900H is the stronger fit. You are getting 22.4% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900H is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-13900H comes in 87.5% more expensive on MSRP at $617 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you 22.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 3700X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 53.3% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 44.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900H vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900H

The Core i9-13900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,444 points. Launch price was $617.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900H versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-13900H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900H scores 27,444 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 20.1% lead for the Core i9-13900H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900H vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+23%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.6 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	32 MB+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	27,444+22%	22,430

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	FCBGA1744	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	24

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900H was priced at $617, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($617 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $288 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900H delivers 44.5 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 42.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$617	$329-47%
Performance per Dollar	44.5	68.2+53%
Release Date	2023	2019

Search Core i9-13900H on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.