Core M-5Y70 vs PRO A6-8550B

Core M-5Y70 vs PRO A6-8550B Performance Spectrum

Core M-5Y70

2 / 4

1,890

+0.4%

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

1,882

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core M-5Y70 vs PRO A6-8550B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core M-5Y70 vs PRO A6-8550B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core M-5Y70

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A6-8550B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while PRO A6-8550B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

PRO A6-8550B

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,882 vs 1,890).

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A6-8550B better than Core M-5Y70?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A6-8550B is ahead with a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y70 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y70 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A6-8550B is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. PRO A6-8550B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core M-5Y70 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.3% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A6-8550B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core M-5Y70 vs PRO A6-8550B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core M-5Y70

The Core M-5Y70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,890 points. Launch price was $69.

PRO A6-8550B

The PRO A6-8550B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,882 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core M-5Y70 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the PRO A6-8550B's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y70 versus 4 GHz on the PRO A6-8550B — a 42.4% clock advantage for the PRO A6-8550B (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core M-5Y70 uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A6-8550B uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y70 scores 1,890 against the PRO A6-8550B's 1,882 — a 0.4% lead for the Core M-5Y70.

Feature	Core M-5Y70	PRO A6-8550B
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	4 GHz+54%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.5 GHz+218%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1024 kB+300%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-Y (2014)	Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark	1,890	1,882

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core M-5Y70 uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A6-8550B uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.