Core m3-6Y30 vs Pro A10-8700B

Core m3-6Y30 vs Pro A10-8700B Performance Spectrum

Core m3-6Y30

2 / 4

2,180

+0.5%

2,170

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core m3-6Y30 vs Pro A10-8700B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core m3-6Y30 vs Pro A10-8700B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core m3-6Y30

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pro A10-8700B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Pro A10-8700B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Pro A10-8700B

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,170 vs 2,180).

Quick Answers

So, is Core m3-6Y30 better than Pro A10-8700B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pro A10-8700B is ahead with a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-6Y30 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-6Y30 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m3-6Y30 is the better buy right now. Core m3-6Y30 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Pro A10-8700B is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pro A10-8700B is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core m3-6Y30 vs Pro A10-8700B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m3-6Y30

The Core m3-6Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,180 points. Launch price was $281.

Pro A10-8700B

The Pro A10-8700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,170 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core m3-6Y30 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pro A10-8700B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A10-8700B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core m3-6Y30 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pro A10-8700B — a 37% clock advantage for the Pro A10-8700B (base: 0.9 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core m3-6Y30 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Pro A10-8700B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-6Y30 scores 2,180 against the Pro A10-8700B's 2,170 — a 0.5% lead for the Core m3-6Y30.

Feature	Core m3-6Y30	Pro A10-8700B
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	3.2 GHz+45%
Base Clock	0.9 GHz	1.8 GHz+100%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Skylake-Y (2015)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,180	2,170

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m3-6Y30 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pro A10-8700B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.