Core m3-7Y30
VS
A12-9700P

Core m3-7Y30 vs A12-9700P

Intel

Core m3-7Y30

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2016
VS
AMD

A12-9700P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m3-7Y30 is positioned at rank 1116 and the A12-9700P is on rank 553, so the A12-9700P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m3-7Y30

#1104
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3412%
#1105
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3362%
#1106
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3086%
#1107
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3072%
#1108
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3044%
#1110
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2940%
#1111
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2819%
#1112
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2814%
#1113
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2738%
#1116
Core m3-7Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1117
Pentium 977
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
99%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
96%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
96%
#1127
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1128
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
95%
#1129
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
95%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
95%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A12-9700P

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
100%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
97%
#541
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
729%
#542
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
718%
#543
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
659%
#544
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
656%
#545
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
650%
#547
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
628%
#548
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
602%
#549
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
601%
#550
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
585%
#553
A12-9700P
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core m3-7Y30 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A12-9700P in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore m3-7Y30A12-9700P
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore m3-7Y30A12-9700P
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m3-7Y30 and A12-9700P

Intel

Core m3-7Y30

The Core m3-7Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,418 points. Launch price was $281.

AMD

A12-9700P

The A12-9700P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,415 points. Launch price was $130.

Processing Power

The Core m3-7Y30 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A12-9700P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A12-9700P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core m3-7Y30 versus 3.4 GHz on the A12-9700P — a 26.7% clock advantage for the A12-9700P (base: 1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core m3-7Y30 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the A12-9700P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-7Y30 scores 2,418 against the A12-9700P's 2,415 — a 0.1% lead for the Core m3-7Y30. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 768 vs 481, a 46% lead for the Core m3-7Y30 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureCore m3-7Y30A12-9700P
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz+31%
Base Clock
1 GHz
2.5 GHz+150%
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
2048 kB+300%
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,418
2,415
Cinebench R23 Multi
645
Geekbench 6 Single
768+60%
481
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,481
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m3-7Y30 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A12-9700P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 on the Core m3-7Y30 versus DDR4-1866 on the A12-9700P — the A12-9700P supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core m3-7Y30) vs 8 (A12-9700P) — the Core m3-7Y30 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore m3-7Y30A12-9700P
Socket
FCBGA1515
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600
DDR4-1866+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10+25%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core m3-7Y30) vs AMD-V (A12-9700P). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 615 (Core m3-7Y30) and Radeon R7 (A12-9700P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m3-7Y30 targets Ultra-portable, A12-9700P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A12-9700P rivals Core i5-6200U.

FeatureCore m3-7Y30A12-9700P
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 615
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Ultra-portable
Laptop