
Core m3-7Y30 vs Atom C3558

Core m3-7Y30

Atom C3558
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m3-7Y30 is positioned at rank 1116 and the Atom C3558 is on rank 365, so the Atom C3558 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core m3-7Y30
Performance Per Dollar Atom C3558
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core m3-7Y30 | Atom C3558 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core m3-7Y30 | Atom C3558 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core m3-7Y30 and Atom C3558

Core m3-7Y30
The Core m3-7Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,418 points. Launch price was $281.

Atom C3558
The Atom C3558 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 16 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,431 points. Launch price was $86.
Processing Power
The Core m3-7Y30 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3558 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3558 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core m3-7Y30 versus 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3558 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core m3-7Y30 (base: 1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core m3-7Y30 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Atom C3558 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-7Y30 scores 2,418 against the Atom C3558's 2,431 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom C3558. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y30 vs 8 MB on the Atom C3558.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y30 | Atom C3558 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+18% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 2.2 GHz+120% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| PassMark | 2,418 | 2,431 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 645 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 768 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,481 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core m3-7Y30 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom C3558 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 on the Core m3-7Y30 versus DDR4-2133 on the Atom C3558 — the Atom C3558 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3558 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core m3-7Y30) vs 12 (Atom C3558) — the Atom C3558 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Kaby Lake-Y SoC (Core m3-7Y30) and Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3558).
| Feature | Core m3-7Y30 | Atom C3558 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | FCBGA1310 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2133+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 256 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 10 | 12+20% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core m3-7Y30) / not specified (Atom C3558). The Core m3-7Y30 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 615), while the Atom C3558 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m3-7Y30 targets Ultra-portable.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y30 | Atom C3558 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 615 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x / VT-d / EPT | — |
| Target Use | Ultra-portable | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











