Core m3-7Y30
VS
Atom C3558

Core m3-7Y30 vs Atom C3558

Intel

Core m3-7Y30

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Atom C3558

4 Cores4 Thrd16 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m3-7Y30 is positioned at rank 1116 and the Atom C3558 is on rank 365, so the Atom C3558 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m3-7Y30

#1104
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3412%
#1105
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3362%
#1106
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3086%
#1107
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3072%
#1108
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3044%
#1110
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2940%
#1111
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2819%
#1112
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2814%
#1113
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2738%
#1116
Core m3-7Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1117
Pentium 977
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
99%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
96%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
96%
#1127
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1128
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
95%
#1129
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
95%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
95%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3558

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5129%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
968%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
860%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
665%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
100%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
99%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
98%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
98%
#365
Atom C3558
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#367
Xeon E5-1410
MSRP: $120|Avg: $55
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3558 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore m3-7Y30Atom C3558
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core m3-7Y30 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore m3-7Y30Atom C3558
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m3-7Y30 and Atom C3558

Intel

Core m3-7Y30

The Core m3-7Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,418 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Atom C3558

The Atom C3558 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 16 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,431 points. Launch price was $86.

Processing Power

The Core m3-7Y30 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3558 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3558 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core m3-7Y30 versus 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3558 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core m3-7Y30 (base: 1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core m3-7Y30 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Atom C3558 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-7Y30 scores 2,418 against the Atom C3558's 2,431 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom C3558. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y30 vs 8 MB on the Atom C3558.

FeatureCore m3-7Y30Atom C3558
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+18%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
1 GHz
2.2 GHz+120%
L3 Cache
4 MB
8 MB+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB
8 MB+1500%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark
2,418
2,431
Cinebench R23 Multi
645
Geekbench 6 Single
768
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,481
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m3-7Y30 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom C3558 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 on the Core m3-7Y30 versus DDR4-2133 on the Atom C3558 — the Atom C3558 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3558 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core m3-7Y30) vs 12 (Atom C3558) — the Atom C3558 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Kaby Lake-Y SoC (Core m3-7Y30) and Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3558).

FeatureCore m3-7Y30Atom C3558
Socket
FCBGA1515
FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
256 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
12+20%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core m3-7Y30) / not specified (Atom C3558). The Core m3-7Y30 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 615), while the Atom C3558 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m3-7Y30 targets Ultra-portable.

FeatureCore m3-7Y30Atom C3558
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 615
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use
Ultra-portable