Core m3-7Y30 vs Core i3-3245
Core m3-7Y30
Core i3-3245
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m3-7Y30 is positioned at rank 1116 and the Core i3-3245 is on rank 794, so the Core i3-3245 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core m3-7Y30
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3245
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core m3-7Y30 | Core i3-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core m3-7Y30 | Core i3-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+461%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core m3-7Y30 and Core i3-3245
Core m3-7Y30
The Core m3-7Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,418 points. Launch price was $281.
Core i3-3245
The Core i3-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,412 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core m3-7Y30 and Core i3-3245 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. The Core m3-7Y30 is built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core m3-7Y30 scores 2,418 against the Core i3-3245's 2,412 — a 0.2% lead for the Core m3-7Y30. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y30 vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i3-3245.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y30 | Core i3-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 3.4 GHz+240% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | — |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 2,418 | 2,412 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 645 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 768 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,481 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core m3-7Y30 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3245 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-3245 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core m3-7Y30) vs 16 (Core i3-3245) — the Core i3-3245 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y30 | Core i3-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 10 | 16+60% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core m3-7Y30) vs VT-x (Core i3-3245). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 615 (Core m3-7Y30) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3245) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m3-7Y30 targets Ultra-portable, Core i3-3245 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y30 | Core i3-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 615 | HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x / VT-d / EPT | VT-x |
| Target Use | Ultra-portable | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core m3-7Y30 launched at $281 MSRP, while the Core i3-3245 debuted at $120. At current prices ($281 vs $50), the Core i3-3245 is $231 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m3-7Y30 delivers 8.6 pts/$ vs 48.2 pts/$ for the Core i3-3245 — making the Core i3-3245 the 139.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y30 | Core i3-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $120-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $281 | $50-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6 | 48.2+460% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core m3-7Y30 and Core i3-3245
