Core m5-6Y57
VS
Core i7-1060G7

Core m5-6Y57 vs Core i7-1060G7

Intel

Core m5-6Y57

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i7-1060G7

4 Cores8 Thrd9 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m5-6Y57 is positioned at rank 1123 and the Core i7-1060G7 is on rank 1197, so the Core m5-6Y57 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m5-6Y57

#1110
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3522%
#1111
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3471%
#1112
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3186%
#1113
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3172%
#1114
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3143%
#1116
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3035%
#1117
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2910%
#1118
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2905%
#1119
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2827%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1124
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
99%
#1125
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
99%
#1126
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
99%
#1127
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
99%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1129
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
98%
#1130
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
98%
#1131
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
97%
#1134
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
93%
#1135
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
#1136
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
93%
#1137
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-1060G7

#1185
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5383%
#1186
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5305%
#1187
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4870%
#1188
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4848%
#1189
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4803%
#1191
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4639%
#1192
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4448%
#1193
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4440%
#1194
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4321%
#1197
Core i7-1060G7
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
98%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
94%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
94%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
93%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
93%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
91%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
90%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
89%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
87%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-1060G7 (2019) utilizes 10 nm technology and LPDDR4-3733, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore m5-6Y57Core i7-1060G7
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Ice Lake (Client) (2019) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core m5-6Y57 (2015) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore m5-6Y57Core i7-1060G7
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m5-6Y57 and Core i7-1060G7

Intel

Core m5-6Y57

The Core m5-6Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,342 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Core i7-1060G7

The Core i7-1060G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 2,322 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core m5-6Y57 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-1060G7 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-1060G7 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core m5-6Y57 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-1060G7 — a 30.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-1060G7 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Core m5-6Y57 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-1060G7 uses Ice Lake (Client) (2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core m5-6Y57 scores 2,342 against the Core i7-1060G7's 2,322 — a 0.9% lead for the Core m5-6Y57. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y57 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1060G7.

FeatureCore m5-6Y57Core i7-1060G7
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
3.8 GHz+36%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz+10%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Skylake-Y (2015)
Ice Lake (Client) (2019)
PassMark
2,342
2,322
Geekbench 6 Single
1,523
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m5-6Y57 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-1060G7 uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore m5-6Y57Core i7-1060G7
Socket
FCBGA1515
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-3733
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core m5-6Y57) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1060G7). The Core i7-1060G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics), while the Core m5-6Y57 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1060G7 targets Premium Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-1060G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4700U.

FeatureCore m5-6Y57Core i7-1060G7
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Plus Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Premium Ultrabook