Core Solo T1300 vs Pentium M 1.50

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1300 vs Pentium M 1.50 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1300 vs Pentium M 1.50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1300

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 24W, a 22W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Pentium M 1.50 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium M 1.50

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Solo T1300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (375 vs 385).
❌1100% higher power demand at 24W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Solo T1300 better than Pentium M 1.50?

Yes. Core Solo T1300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Solo T1300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Solo T1300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Solo T1300 is the better buy right now. Core Solo T1300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $209 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Solo T1300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Solo T1300 vs Pentium M 1.50 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Solo T1300

The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium M 1.50

The Pentium M 1.50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1300 and Pentium M 1.50 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 versus 1.5 GHz on the Pentium M 1.50 — a 10.1% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1300. The Core Solo T1300 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium M 1.50 uses Banias (2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1300 scores 385 against the Pentium M 1.50's 375 — a 2.6% lead for the Core Solo T1300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core Solo T1300	Pentium M 1.50
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.66 GHz+11%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.66 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Process	65 nm-50%	130 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Banias (2003)
PassMark	385+3%	375