
Core Ultra 5 245T

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 245T
2025Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,529 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 576.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.2 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,945 vs 32,444).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.8 vs 120.2 PassMark/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
- ❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 245T moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 245T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 245T better than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 245T
The Core Ultra 5 245T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 32,444 points. Launch price was $270.


Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 31,945 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 245T packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245T versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245T (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245T scores 32,444 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX's 31,945 — a 1.5% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245T. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245T vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245T | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14 | 32 / 64+129% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+21% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 64 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+16967% |
| Process | 3 nm-75% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 32,444+2% | 31,945 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 33,213 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,206 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 7,612 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 245T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245T versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — the Core Ultra 5 245T supports 118.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 245T) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 245T) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245T | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+118% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 2048 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). The Core Ultra 5 245T includes integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG 64EU), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 245T targets Desktop Low Power, Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX targets Extreme Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX rivals Core i9-9980XE.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245T | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Arc Xe-LPG 64EU | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop Low Power | Extreme Content Creation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 5 245T was priced at $270, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX came in at $1799. On launch pricing ($270 vs $1799), Core Ultra 5 245T was $1529 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 245T delivers 120.2 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — making the Core Ultra 5 245T the 148.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245T | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $270-85% | $1799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 120.2+575% | 17.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














