Core Ultra 7 265T vs Core i9-13900E
Core Ultra 7 265T
Core i9-13900E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265T
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13900E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265T | Core i9-13900E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($362) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($554) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265T | Core i9-13900E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+54%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($362) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($554) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265T and Core i9-13900E
Core Ultra 7 265T
The Core Ultra 7 265T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,681 points. Launch price was $384.
Core i9-13900E
The Core i9-13900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,476 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265T packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i9-13900E offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265T versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-13900E — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265T (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Core i9-13900E uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265T scores 40,681 against the Core i9-13900E's 40,476 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,954 vs 2,606, a 12.5% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,455 vs 15,000 (9.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265T). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265T vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900E.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | Core i9-13900E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20 | 24 / 32+20% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+2% | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 1.8 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+50% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-70% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 40,681 | 40,476 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 34,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,954+13% | 2,606 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,455+10% | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-13900E uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 7 265T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265T) vs 20 (Core i9-13900E) — the Core Ultra 7 265T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,H870,B860 (Core Ultra 7 265T) and W680,Q670,Z790,H770 (Core i9-13900E).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | Core i9-13900E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 265T has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG 4-core) (Core Ultra 7 265T) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265T targets High End Desktop, Core i9-13900E targets Embedded.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | Core i9-13900E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG 4-core) | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High End Desktop | Embedded |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265T launched at $384 MSRP, while the Core i9-13900E debuted at $554. At current prices ($362 vs $554), the Core Ultra 7 265T is $192 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265T delivers 112.4 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900E — making the Core Ultra 7 265T the 42.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | Core i9-13900E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $384-31% | $554 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $362-35% | $554 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.4+54% | 73.1 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265T and Core i9-13900E
