E-240 vs Athlon XP 2700+
E-240
Athlon XP 2700+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E-240 is positioned at rank 1169 and the Athlon XP 2700+ is on rank 1124, so the Athlon XP 2700+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar E-240
Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 2700+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | E-240 | Athlon XP 2700+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Thoroughbred (2001−2002) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | E-240 | Athlon XP 2700+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of E-240 and Athlon XP 2700+
E-240
The E-240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 338 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon XP 2700+
The Athlon XP 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2002 (23 years ago). It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 360 points. Launch price was $85.
Processing Power
Both the E-240 and Athlon XP 2700+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the E-240 versus 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 2700+ — a 36.5% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2700+. The E-240 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Athlon XP 2700+ uses Thoroughbred (2001−2002) (130 nm). In PassMark, the E-240 scores 338 against the Athlon XP 2700+'s 360 — a 6.3% lead for the Athlon XP 2700+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | E-240 | Athlon XP 2700+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.17 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB |
| Process | 40 nm-69% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Zacate (2011−2013) | Thoroughbred (2001−2002) |
| PassMark | 338 | 360+7% |
Memory & Platform
The E-240 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon XP 2700+ uses A (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | E-240 | Athlon XP 2700+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT1 | A |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR-333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 1 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on E-240 and Athlon XP 2700+
