E-240
VS
Atom N435

E-240 vs Atom N435

AMD

E-240

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Atom N435

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E-240 is positioned at rank 1169 and the Atom N435 is on rank 646, so the Atom N435 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E-240

#1157
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4340%
#1158
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4277%
#1159
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3926%
#1160
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3908%
#1161
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3872%
#1163
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3740%
#1164
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3586%
#1165
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3580%
#1166
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3484%
#1169
E-240
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
95%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N435

#634
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
876%
#635
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
863%
#636
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
792%
#637
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
789%
#638
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
781%
#640
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
755%
#641
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
724%
#642
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
722%
#643
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
703%
#646
Atom N435
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The E-240 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom N435 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightE-240Atom N435
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Pinetrail (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE-240Atom N435
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E-240 and Atom N435

AMD

E-240

The E-240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 338 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Atom N435

The Atom N435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The E-240 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom N435's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the E-240 versus 1.33 GHz on the Atom N435 — a 12% clock advantage for the E-240. The E-240 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Atom N435 uses Pinetrail (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the E-240 scores 338 against the Atom N435's 335 — a 0.9% lead for the E-240.

FeatureE-240Atom N435
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 2
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz+13%
1.33 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
40 nm-11%
45 nm
Architecture
Zacate (2011−2013)
Pinetrail (2009−2011)
PassMark
338
335
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E-240 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom N435 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE-240Atom N435
Socket
FT1
FCBGA559
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom N435 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the E-240 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureE-240Atom N435
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3150