
E-240 vs Atom N435

E-240

Atom N435
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E-240 is positioned at rank 1169 and the Atom N435 is on rank 646, so the Atom N435 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar E-240
Performance Per Dollar Atom N435
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | E-240 | Atom N435 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Pinetrail (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | E-240 | Atom N435 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of E-240 and Atom N435

E-240
The E-240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 338 points. Launch price was $69.

Atom N435
The Atom N435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The E-240 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom N435's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the E-240 versus 1.33 GHz on the Atom N435 — a 12% clock advantage for the E-240. The E-240 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Atom N435 uses Pinetrail (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the E-240 scores 338 against the Atom N435's 335 — a 0.9% lead for the E-240.
| Feature | E-240 | Atom N435 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz+13% | 1.33 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB |
| Process | 40 nm-11% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Zacate (2011−2013) | Pinetrail (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 338 | 335 |
Memory & Platform
The E-240 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom N435 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | E-240 | Atom N435 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT1 | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 2 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 1 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
The Atom N435 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the E-240 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | E-240 | Atom N435 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel GMA 3150 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















