E-240
VS
Athlon XP 2600+

E-240 vs Athlon XP 2600+

AMD

E-240

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Athlon XP 2600+

1 Cores1 Thrd68 WWMax: 1.92 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E-240 is positioned at rank 1169 and the Athlon XP 2600+ is on rank 1085, so the Athlon XP 2600+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E-240

#1157
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4340%
#1158
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4277%
#1159
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3926%
#1160
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3908%
#1161
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3872%
#1163
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3740%
#1164
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3586%
#1165
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3580%
#1166
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3484%
#1169
E-240
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
95%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 2600+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
89831%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
84882%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
61631%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
18567%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
14707%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
12866%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7369%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7273%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
6622%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
6621%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
6547%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6371%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6282%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6256%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6199%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
100%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
99%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
96%
#1088
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
95%
#1089
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
95%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
95%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
94%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
94%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
93%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
89%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
87%
#1096
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
82%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
75%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
68%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
66%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
65%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E-240 (2011) utilizes 40 nm technology and **DDR3 Single-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE-240Athlon XP 2600+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Barton (2001−2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon XP 2600+ (2001) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE-240Athlon XP 2600+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E-240 and Athlon XP 2600+

AMD

E-240

The E-240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 338 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon XP 2600+

The Athlon XP 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.92 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 340 points. Launch price was $23.

Processing Power

Both the E-240 and Athlon XP 2600+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the E-240 versus 1.92 GHz on the Athlon XP 2600+ — a 24.6% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2600+. The E-240 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Athlon XP 2600+ uses Barton (2001−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the E-240 scores 338 against the Athlon XP 2600+'s 340 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon XP 2600+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureE-240Athlon XP 2600+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
1.92 GHz+28%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512K
Process
40 nm-69%
130 nm
Architecture
Zacate (2011−2013)
Barton (2001−2004)
PassMark
338
340
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E-240 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon XP 2600+ uses A (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE-240Athlon XP 2600+
Socket
FT1
A
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0