E1 Micro-6200T
VS
Athlon 64 3000+

E1 Micro-6200T vs Athlon 64 3000+

AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 3000+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1 Micro-6200T is positioned at rank 1091 and the Athlon 64 3000+ is on rank 1095, so the E1 Micro-6200T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1 Micro-6200T

#1079
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3088%
#1080
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3043%
#1081
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2794%
#1082
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2781%
#1083
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2756%
#1085
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2661%
#1086
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2552%
#1087
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2547%
#1088
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2479%
#1091
E1 Micro-6200T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
100%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
98%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
97%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
95%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3000+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
103217%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
97530%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
70815%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
21333%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
16898%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
14783%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
8467%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
8356%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
7609%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
7608%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
7523%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
7320%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
7218%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
7188%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
7123%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
100%
#1096
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
94%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
86%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
78%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
76%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
75%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
72%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
70%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
65%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
64%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
62%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
61%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
59%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
56%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
52%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
49%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E1 Micro-6200T (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE1 Micro-6200TAthlon 64 3000+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 3000+ (2001) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE1 Micro-6200TAthlon 64 3000+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1 Micro-6200T and Athlon 64 3000+

AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

The E1 Micro-6200T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon 64 3000+

The Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $65.

Processing Power

The E1 Micro-6200T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon 64 3000+ offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the E1 Micro-6200T has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the E1 Micro-6200T versus 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3000+ — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3000+. The E1 Micro-6200T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon 64 3000+ uses Clawhammer (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the E1 Micro-6200T scores 475 against the Athlon 64 3000+'s 450 — a 5.4% lead for the E1 Micro-6200T.

FeatureE1 Micro-6200TAthlon 64 3000+
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
2 GHz+43%
Base Clock
1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB+100%
512K
Process
28 nm-78%
130 nm
Architecture
Mullins (2014)
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
PassMark
475+6%
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1 Micro-6200T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 3000+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE1 Micro-6200TAthlon 64 3000+
Socket
FT3
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0