E1 Micro-6200T
VS
Celeron 450

E1 Micro-6200T vs Celeron 450

AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Celeron 450

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1 Micro-6200T is positioned at rank 1091 and the Celeron 450 is on rank 1004, so the Celeron 450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1 Micro-6200T

#1079
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3088%
#1080
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3043%
#1081
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2794%
#1082
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2781%
#1083
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2756%
#1085
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2661%
#1086
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2552%
#1087
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2547%
#1088
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2479%
#1091
E1 Micro-6200T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
100%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
98%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
97%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
95%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 450

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
33374%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
31535%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
22897%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6898%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5464%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4780%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2738%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2702%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2460%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2460%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2432%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2367%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2334%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2324%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2303%
#1003
Core i5-655K
MSRP: $216|Avg: $55
100%
#1004
Celeron 450
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
100%
#1005
Core 2 Duo E4600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $9.6
99%
#1007
Core i7-870S
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
99%
#1008
Core 2 Duo E6540
MSRP: $163|Avg: $15
98%
#1009
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
98%
#1010
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
97%
#1011
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
96%
#1012
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
96%
#1013
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
95%
#1014
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
95%
#1016
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
94%
#1018
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E1 Micro-6200T (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE1 Micro-6200TCeleron 450
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe-L (2007−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 450 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE1 Micro-6200TCeleron 450
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1 Micro-6200T and Celeron 450

AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

The E1 Micro-6200T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron 450

The Celeron 450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $53.

Processing Power

The E1 Micro-6200T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron 450 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the E1 Micro-6200T has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the E1 Micro-6200T versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 450 — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Celeron 450 (base: 1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The E1 Micro-6200T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron 450 uses Conroe-L (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the E1 Micro-6200T scores 475 against the Celeron 450's 495 — a 4.1% lead for the Celeron 450.

FeatureE1 Micro-6200TCeleron 450
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
2.2 GHz+57%
Base Clock
1 GHz
2.2 GHz+120%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB+100%
512 kB
Process
28 nm-57%
65 nm
Architecture
Mullins (2014)
Conroe-L (2007−2008)
PassMark
475
495+4%
Geekbench 6 Multi
269
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1 Micro-6200T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 450 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE1 Micro-6200TCeleron 450
Socket
FT3
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E1 Micro-6200T) / No (Celeron 450). Primary use case: Celeron 450 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 450 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

FeatureE1 Micro-6200TCeleron 450
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget