E1 Micro-6200T
VS
Celeron 900

E1 Micro-6200T vs Celeron 900

AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2014
VS

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1 Micro-6200T is positioned at rank 1091 and the Celeron 900 is on rank 1193, so the E1 Micro-6200T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1 Micro-6200T

#1079
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3088%
#1080
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3043%
#1081
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2794%
#1082
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2781%
#1083
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2756%
#1085
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2661%
#1086
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2552%
#1087
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2547%
#1088
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2479%
#1091
E1 Micro-6200T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
100%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
98%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
97%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
95%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 900

#1181
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5202%
#1182
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5126%
#1183
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4706%
#1184
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4684%
#1185
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4641%
#1187
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4482%
#1188
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4298%
#1189
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4291%
#1190
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4176%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
100%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
99%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
97%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
95%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
93%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
93%
#1203
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
90%
#1204
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
90%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
90%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
90%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
88%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The E1 Micro-6200T leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 900 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightE1 Micro-6200TCeleron 900
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE1 Micro-6200TCeleron 900
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1 Micro-6200T and Celeron 900

AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

The E1 Micro-6200T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron 900

The Celeron 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The E1 Micro-6200T is built on the Mullins (2014) architecture. In PassMark, the E1 Micro-6200T scores 475 against the Celeron 900's 485 — a 2.1% lead for the Celeron 900.

FeatureE1 Micro-6200TCeleron 900
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
1 GHz
2.2 GHz+120%
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1024 kB
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Mullins (2014)
PassMark
475
485+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
220
Geekbench 6 Multi
229
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1 Micro-6200T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 900 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE1 Micro-6200TCeleron 900
Socket
FT3
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E1 Micro-6200T) / No (Celeron 900). Primary use case: Celeron 900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 900 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

FeatureE1 Micro-6200TCeleron 900
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget