E2-3800 vs Xeon 5120
E2-3800
Xeon 5120
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-3800 is positioned at rank 1047 and the Xeon 5120 is on rank 857, so the Xeon 5120 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar E2-3800
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 5120
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | E2-3800 | Xeon 5120 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Woodcrest (2006) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | E2-3800 | Xeon 5120 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+31%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of E2-3800 and Xeon 5120
E2-3800
The E2-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,136 points. Launch price was $50.
Xeon 5120
The Xeon 5120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $45.
Processing Power
The E2-3800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon 5120 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the E2-3800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the E2-3800 versus 1.87 GHz on the Xeon 5120 — a 36% clock advantage for the Xeon 5120. The E2-3800 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon 5120 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3800 scores 1,136 against the Xeon 5120's 1,115 — a 1.9% lead for the E2-3800.
| Feature | E2-3800 | Xeon 5120 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.3 GHz | 1.87 GHz+44% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.86 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB | 4 MB+100% |
| Process | 28 nm-57% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Woodcrest (2006) |
| PassMark | 1,136+2% | 1,115 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 136 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 389 | — |
Memory & Platform
The E2-3800 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 5120 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | E2-3800 | Xeon 5120 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (E2-3800) / not specified (Xeon 5120). The E2-3800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8280), while the Xeon 5120 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | E2-3800 | Xeon 5120 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8280 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
The E2-3800 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Xeon 5120 debuted at $107. At current prices ($20 vs $15), the Xeon 5120 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the E2-3800 delivers 56.8 pts/$ vs 74.3 pts/$ for the Xeon 5120 — making the Xeon 5120 the 26.7% better value option.
| Feature | E2-3800 | Xeon 5120 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-7% | $107 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8 | 74.3+31% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on E2-3800 and Xeon 5120
