
EPYC 4464P

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4464P
2024Why buy it
- β +37.6% higher PassMark.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
- β Costs $20 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- β Delivers 44.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 110.0 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- β Draws 105W instead of 120W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (34,293 vs 47,185).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4464P, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 76.4 vs 110.0 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4464P better than Ryzen 7 7800X3D?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4464P
The EPYC 4464P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023β2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,185 points. Launch price was $399.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4464P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the EPYC 4464P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4464P versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D β a 7.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4464P (base: 3.7 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 4464P uses the Raphael (2023β2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4464P scores 47,185 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 β a 31.6% lead for the EPYC 4464P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4464P vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+8% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.4 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023β2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) |
| PassMark | 47,185+38% | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 5200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM5,FL1 (EPYC 4464P) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4464P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). Both include integrated graphics β AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4464P) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 4464P rivals Core i9-13900; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4464P was priced at $429, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D came in at $449. On launch pricing ($429 vs $449), EPYC 4464P was $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4464P delivers 110.0 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D β making the EPYC 4464P the 36.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-4% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.0+44% | 76.4 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














