EPYC 4465P
VS
Core Ultra 7 265F

EPYC 4465P vs Core Ultra 7 265F

AMD

EPYC 4465P

12 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 265F

20 Cores20 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4465P

#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
148%
#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
116%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
100%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
96%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
96%
#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
91%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
91%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
91%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
87%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
87%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
85%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
81%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
80%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265F

#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
122%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
121%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
118%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
116%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
114%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
113%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
113%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
109%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
106%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
105%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
105%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
103%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
102%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
102%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
102%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
100%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
100%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
98%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
98%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
98%
#34
Ryzen 5 7400F
MSRP: $150|Avg: $147
98%
#35
Ryzen 5 9600X
MSRP: $279|Avg: $178
95%
#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
92%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
92%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
91%
#39
Ryzen 5 5600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $135
91%
#40
Core i5-14600KF
MSRP: $304|Avg: $239
91%
#41
Ryzen 7 5800
MSRP: $349|Avg: $160
90%
#42
Core i3-14100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $96
90%
#43
Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $140
90%
#44
Ryzen 5 7600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $178
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($399) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 4465P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 4465PCore Ultra 7 265F
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($399)
More affordable ($276)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Grado (2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 7 265F ($276), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($123 less, 31% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 4465PCore Ultra 7 265F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+42%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($399)
More affordable ($276)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4465P and Core Ultra 7 265F

AMD

EPYC 4465P

The EPYC 4465P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,216 points. Launch price was $399.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265F

The Core Ultra 7 265F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,161 points. Launch price was $379.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4465P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265F offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4465P versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265F — a 1.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4465P (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 4465P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265F uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4465P scores 50,216 against the Core Ultra 7 265F's 49,161 — a 2.1% lead for the EPYC 4465P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4465P vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265F.

FeatureEPYC 4465PCore Ultra 7 265F
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
20 / 20+67%
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+2%
5.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+42%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+113%
30 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)+200%
Process
4 nm
3 nm-25%
Architecture
Grado (2025)
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark
50,216+2%
49,161
Cinebench R23 Multi
25,459
Geekbench 6 Single
3,000
Geekbench 6 Multi
20,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4465P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265F uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4465P versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265F — the EPYC 4465P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 7 265F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4465P) vs 24 (Core Ultra 7 265F) — the EPYC 4465P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4465P) and Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 7 265F).

FeatureEPYC 4465PCore Ultra 7 265F
Socket
AM5
LGA1851
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
5200+103900%
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
128
256 GB+209715100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28+17%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the EPYC 4465P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4465P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265F). The EPYC 4465P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Core Ultra 7 265F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265F targets High Performance Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 4465P rivals Core i7-14700K.

FeatureEPYC 4465PCore Ultra 7 265F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High Performance Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4465P launched at $399 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 265F debuted at $369. At current prices ($399 vs $276), the Core Ultra 7 265F is $123 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4465P delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 178.1 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265F — making the Core Ultra 7 265F the 34.4% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4465PCore Ultra 7 265F
MSRP
$399
$369-8%
Avg Price (30d)
$399
$276-31%
Performance per Dollar
125.9
178.1+41%
Release Date
2025
2025