CPU
GPU
EPYC 4484PX
Core Ultra 7 265
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4484PX
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 4484PX | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($599) | ✅ More affordable ($320) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 4484PX | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+84%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($599) | ✅ More affordable ($320) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4484PX and Core Ultra 7 265
EPYC 4484PX
The EPYC 4484PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,547 points. Launch price was $599.
Core Ultra 7 265
The Core Ultra 7 265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,666 points. Launch price was $394.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4484PX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265 offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the EPYC 4484PX versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265 — a 5.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4484PX (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 4484PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4484PX scores 50,547 against the Core Ultra 7 265's 49,666 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 4484PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4484PX vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 20 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+6% | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+83% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+327% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+200% |
| Process | 5 nm | 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 50,547+2% | 49,666 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,950 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4484PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4484PX versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265 — the Core Ultra 7 265 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 7 265 supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 24 (Core Ultra 7 265) — the EPYC 4484PX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4484PX) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 7 265).
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 6400+127900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+78643100% | 256 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4484PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4484PX) and Intel Arc Graphics (Core Ultra 7 265) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4484PX targets Workstation / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4484PX rivals Ryzen 9 7900X3D; Core Ultra 7 265 rivals Ryzen 7 9700X.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | Intel Arc Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation / Server | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4484PX launched at $599 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 265 debuted at $384. At current prices ($599 vs $320), the Core Ultra 7 265 is $279 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4484PX delivers 84.4 pts/$ vs 155.2 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265 — making the Core Ultra 7 265 the 59.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $384-36% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $599 | $320-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.4 | 155.2+84% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4484PX and Core Ultra 7 265
