EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Gold 6554S

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4484PX

12 Cores24 Thrd120 WWMax: 5.6 GHz2024

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6554S

36 Cores72 Thrd270 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Gold 6554S Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4484PX

12 / 24

50,547

0.0%

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Ryzen 9 5900X

Ryzen 9 7845HX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Gold 6554S

36 / 72

50,777

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Gold 6554S FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Gold 6554S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4484PX

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,558 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,157 MSRP).
✅Delivers 424.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.4 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,157 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 270W, a 150W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 6554S needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (50,547 vs 50,777).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 180 MB).

Xeon Gold 6554S

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (180 MB vs 128 MB).
✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4484PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.1 vs 84.4 PassMark/$ ($3,157 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌125% higher power demand at 270W vs 120W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4484PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4484PX better than Xeon Gold 6554S?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4484PX is ahead with a 34.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6554S pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6554S also has the bigger cache pool with 40.6% larger total L3 cache (180 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6554S is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 36 cores and 72 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 40.6% larger total L3 cache (180 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4484PX is the better buy right now. EPYC 4484PX comes in $2,558 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $3,157 MSRP, and it still gives you a 34.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6554S is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 424.7% better value on MSRP (84.4 vs 16.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4484PX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Gold 6554S Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4484PX

The EPYC 4484PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,547 points. Launch price was $599.

Xeon Gold 6554S

The Xeon Gold 6554S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 180 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5200 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 50,777 points. Launch price was $3,157.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4484PX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6554S offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon Gold 6554S has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the EPYC 4484PX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6554S — a 33.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 4484PX (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 4484PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6554S uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4484PX scores 50,547 against the Xeon Gold 6554S's 50,777 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6554S. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4484PX vs 180 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6554S.

Feature	EPYC 4484PX	Xeon Gold 6554S
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	36 / 72+200%
Boost Clock	5.6 GHz+40%	4 GHz
Base Clock	4.4 GHz+100%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	180 MB (total)+41%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	50,547	50,777
Cinebench R23 Multi	24,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,950	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,500	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4484PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6554S uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6554S supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6554S). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6554S) — the Xeon Gold 6554S offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4484PX) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6554S).

Feature	EPYC 4484PX	Xeon Gold 6554S
Socket	AM5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	80+186%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4484PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6554S). The EPYC 4484PX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6554S requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4484PX targets Workstation / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4484PX rivals Ryzen 9 7900X3D; Xeon Gold 6554S rivals EPYC 9384X.

Feature	EPYC 4484PX	Xeon Gold 6554S
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, AMD-Vi	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Workstation / Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4484PX was priced at $599, while the Xeon Gold 6554S came in at $3157. On launch pricing ($599 vs $3157), EPYC 4484PX was $2558 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4484PX delivers 84.4 pts/$ vs 16.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6554S — making the EPYC 4484PX the 136% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4484PX	Xeon Gold 6554S
MSRP	$599-81%	$3157
Performance per Dollar	84.4+424%	16.1
Release Date	2024	2023

Search EPYC 4484PX on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6554S on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.